| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
[abartlet@samba.org Some python2 style super() calls remain due
to being an actual, even if reasonable, behaviour change]
|
|
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
|
|
When creating a new smb.conf from scratch during a join/clone/etc, the
'binddns dir' setting still uses the source smb.conf/default setting,
instead of the targetdir sub-directory.
I noticed this problem when trying to create a new testenv - the
provision() was trying to create /usr/local/samba/bind-dns directory,
which would fail if samba hadn't already been installed on the host
machine.
Now that this is fixed, we also need to fix tests that were explicitly
asserting that no unexpected directories were left behind after the test
completes.
This change also breaks the upgradeprovision script. The upgrade-
provision calls newprovision() to create a reference provision in a
temporary directory. However, previously this temporary provision was
creating the bind-dns directory in the actual upgrade directory as a
side-effect, e.g. it did a provision() with
targetdir=alpha13_upgrade_full/private/referenceprovisionLBKBh2 and this
ended up creating alpha13_upgrade_full/bind-dns as a side-effect.
The provision() now creates bind-dns in the specified targetdir, but
this means check_for_DNS() fails (it tries to create bind-dns sub-
directories, but the upgrade's bind-dns doesn't exist). I've avoided
this problem by making sure bind-dns exists as part of the
check_for_DNS() processing.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jun 28 06:22:16 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
|
|
This avoids running the test while samba is modifying and locking the same database,
as this can lead to a deadlock.
The deadlock is not seen in production as the LDB read lock is not held while
waiting for another process, but this test needs to do this to demonstrate
the locking safety.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Dec 8 21:47:55 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
|
|
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Mar 2 03:57:34 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
